Implement Enums #17
Closed
Implement Enums #17
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This can't be used as is, please replay the changes without the |
|
@JonasAlaif with all the other changes that happened to the type encoder I'm not able to just replay the changes on the main branch. I will recreate this manually on top of the current branch without the fmt run but it'll take a bit more effort than just a rebase. |
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Replaced by #24
Builds on top of #16. To see what changed since #16 see https://github.com/tillarnold/prusti-dev/compare/rustfmt..tillarnold:prusti-dev:enum
This adds support for enums to new prusti, pure (snapshots) as well as impure (predicates).
I refactored
mk_structliketo extract the different parts into functions that i can then reuse formk_enum.TODO: